(DW Badge) Home News Results Gallery Discuss Visitors Race Diary Portages Rules About DW Teddington Tide Timer Meet the Crew Paddy Ashdown M.P. Links
Contact
Devizes To Westminster
A Paddler's Perspective
(Picture)

Devizes to Westminster 2000 Abandonned

River conditions force premature end of race.

Latest update: 28-April-2000 (latest addition usually at bottom of page)

As reported on Ceefax (initally page 110, now page 122 at 21:04 of April 22nd), some time in the early hours of Easter Saturday the 53rd running of the Devizes to Westminster canoe race became the first to be abandonned. Ceefax (and apparently also Radio 2) reported that in one incident at Windsor, two canoeists were left stranded. There were at least six capsizes due to the extreme weather conditions. Very few details are available at this point, but we expect an official announcement soon. (Now available at http://www.dwrace.org.uk/cancellation.html. (N.B. This site has no official connection with the race.) When the race was stopped, no crew had yet finished, but some reached Teddington before being pulled out.

After months of planning and training, this anti-climax is a huge disappointment to all involved in the race; paddlers, supporters and organisers. I hope that paddlers won't give the organisers unnecessary stick for this decision; presumably it is one that was forced upon them by the events. The organisers work harder than anyone to make DW a success and to resist the nannying tendancies of the various authorities; but when the emergency services are being called to make a number of early morning rescues of capsized paddlers, and when the environment agency has issued a red alert (meaning that all shipping is advised to leave the water), it may have been the case that to not stop the race would have damaged the chances of retaining permission to run the race in future years.

The following has appeared on the official website:

It was after considerable deliberation that the decision was taken to cancel the race and we are all aware of the disappointment that this has caused for paddlers, support crews and race staff alike, all of whom had put a great deal of preparation into this event.
The Chief Official will be writing to all competitors soon but would like to take this opportunity to thank everybody involved over the weekend for their support.

It appears that a number of crews decided to continue paddling outside of the race, making it to Westminster; of these 414 Steve Baker and Duncan Capps beat the 1979 DW record - read about it in Duncan's own words in the discussion area. Also 139 Scott Kemper and Owen Peake posted a time in the junior class possibly only ever bettered once: 14:35:56. These times are of course unofficial and won't appear in any of the records. Should they? Or did these crews selfishly jeopardise the future of the event? Or should these crews be commended for their achievement and for proving that the conditions didn't present a problem to those competent enough?

Amongst the questions still to be properly answered are:

There are also wider questions about the running of the event; what has happenned to the club paddlers in the junior doubles? Why is the event so race-orientated as opposed to the original challenge, and why is little consideration being given to the increased danger this brings as crews not competent to do so race through the night or in the junior doubles? On the other hand, no senior crew is forced to compete through the night; the decision is entirely their own. Some heavyweight voices are saying that the writing has been on the wall for years, and been ignored, that the committee should take responsibility. Other calls for the committee to go seem to be more like rants induced by the disappointment of this year. Part of the nature of the Internet is that everyone mixes together freely, and some will use this freedom to give their opinions greater prominence than they are really worth, so please be wise; cast aspersions on the committee (and thereby the whole event) only if you can back it up with provable facts.
(DW Medal)